dschlow
Sep 12, 03:03 PM
Originally posted by Moxiemike
Now sure, there might be workflow issues with magazine and large publishing but there is NO problem whatsoever with printing at commerical presses.
I don't know where this myth has arrived from, but it's just not true. I'm in po-dunky pittsburgh, pa and man, everyone has ID, most print shops have "ID Files accepted here"
What Qps/copy desk allows you to do is have the editors write in a seperate program (copy desk) so they don't f-up your nice layouts. The two work together, i.e. the writers work in copy desk and the text appears in your quark layout. Without them ever having access to move shapes/objects around. The process really speeds things up, as you can work on the layout while they're writing. It's not a matter of being able to accept files or not.
Now sure, there might be workflow issues with magazine and large publishing but there is NO problem whatsoever with printing at commerical presses.
I don't know where this myth has arrived from, but it's just not true. I'm in po-dunky pittsburgh, pa and man, everyone has ID, most print shops have "ID Files accepted here"
What Qps/copy desk allows you to do is have the editors write in a seperate program (copy desk) so they don't f-up your nice layouts. The two work together, i.e. the writers work in copy desk and the text appears in your quark layout. Without them ever having access to move shapes/objects around. The process really speeds things up, as you can work on the layout while they're writing. It's not a matter of being able to accept files or not.
MacRumorUser
Mar 20, 11:54 AM
Nice way of telling me it's worth avoiding :D
You read into that what you wanted to hear.
There's nothing to avoid really. It's near the best version of lemmings since the Amiga ones.
Faults are the no mouse support, but in fairness the controller works very well. And 40 levels wont last you forever.
But like I say for �3.50 can you really complain ?
Well as it's you Jimmi - the answer is probably ;) :p :D j/k
You read into that what you wanted to hear.
There's nothing to avoid really. It's near the best version of lemmings since the Amiga ones.
Faults are the no mouse support, but in fairness the controller works very well. And 40 levels wont last you forever.
But like I say for �3.50 can you really complain ?
Well as it's you Jimmi - the answer is probably ;) :p :D j/k
WildCowboy
Apr 19, 02:29 PM
Was that BillyG in a mugshot?
Yes (http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/gatesmug1.html).
Yes (http://www.thesmokinggun.com/mugshots/gatesmug1.html).
sushi
May 30, 01:19 PM
Until you remembered about that huge Coke you drank an hour or so ago while out and about.
Now that's pressure! :D
Now that's pressure! :D
bousozoku
May 9, 10:46 PM
HAHAH yes an apple outlet would be sweet...my family is always in the Lancaster area for those outlets...especially the ones in Reading.
I used to go to both areas for Christmas shopping. I wish I could get to Reading China and Glass. They had some amazing deals on all sorts of good stuff. Orlando has outlet malls but they charge retail here mostly.
I used to go to both areas for Christmas shopping. I wish I could get to Reading China and Glass. They had some amazing deals on all sorts of good stuff. Orlando has outlet malls but they charge retail here mostly.
twoodcc
Dec 8, 10:32 AM
well i couldn't get it work on my intel mac. i asked for help, but no one responded. but i'm killing it on SETI though :cool:
Shrek
Sep 17, 09:49 PM
Who's yelling?
razzmatazz
Apr 8, 07:20 PM
I am glad they recognized letting you guys in first. It was chaos.
Did yall get ahead of the people that cut ahead? I was telling the Apple Employee that yall were with me.
Did yall get ahead of the people that cut ahead? I was telling the Apple Employee that yall were with me.
jefhatfield
Sep 15, 09:31 AM
Originally posted by iGAV
I don't think the situation will arise where we are comparing the speed of the G4 Vs the P5 actually...... ;)
i hope by the time pentium 5 hits the shelves, there will be a G5 on the shelves
btw, igav, i see that you are on akira's site...i should go there and join up and give the old alphatech a hard time...i miss alphatech and his intelligent comments...even when he gets unintelligent and flames newbies:eek: :p ;)
I don't think the situation will arise where we are comparing the speed of the G4 Vs the P5 actually...... ;)
i hope by the time pentium 5 hits the shelves, there will be a G5 on the shelves
btw, igav, i see that you are on akira's site...i should go there and join up and give the old alphatech a hard time...i miss alphatech and his intelligent comments...even when he gets unintelligent and flames newbies:eek: :p ;)
Dr. No
Nov 10, 01:37 AM
How does it compare to Camino speed-wise??
I think that the JavaScript engine in Camino is faster.
JavaScript Engines can be tested with BenchJS- just put it into Google.
Can anyone else try comparing the two?? Choosing one is so hard. I love Firefox on the PC, but I am a Mac person. ;)
I think that the JavaScript engine in Camino is faster.
JavaScript Engines can be tested with BenchJS- just put it into Google.
Can anyone else try comparing the two?? Choosing one is so hard. I love Firefox on the PC, but I am a Mac person. ;)
rEd Eye
Oct 25, 07:49 AM
Weird.
wdlove
Jun 25, 08:55 PM
I think someone should keep an email list of all 3446 folders. that way, we can send out a semi-annual newsletter or similar - that way, we can remind people to keep folding that may otherwise never come back.
ideas?
It's a very nice idea. The only problem is that to some it could be considered a nuisance. I would recommend that you PM arn or one of the Mods to see what they think.
We have many good ideas that never seem to come to fruition.
ideas?
It's a very nice idea. The only problem is that to some it could be considered a nuisance. I would recommend that you PM arn or one of the Mods to see what they think.
We have many good ideas that never seem to come to fruition.
fourthtunz
Sep 12, 06:36 PM
Well, intel schmintel, its still windoz! Just fyi, the new dual 867 is screamin fast in Jaguar, so the dual thing is now real.
As far as the future, don't count Apple out yet.
Peace daniel:)
As far as the future, don't count Apple out yet.
Peace daniel:)
Dagless
Mar 20, 08:16 PM
I think Microsoft is using hard drive capacity against the PS3. 120 GB vs. 60 GB. What are you going to choose? Ignoring BluRay (and it's likely consumers will ignore BluRay), this may appear to be the better buy at quick glance especially with an online media store behind it.
I hope this would mean a price drop on the Premium box, but I'm guessing not :(
If the Elite went at a 399 price point and the Premium takes the 299 price point, it would be a glorious day :) But, it's not going to happen anytime soon. "Late-summer or fall" at best doesn't help me.
At this stage a larger HDD size would be nothing more than icing on the cake for MS. I find it hard to imagine the PS3 catching up any time soon. When numbers are neck and neck and theres pressure on 3rd party devs - then we'll see how low these big guys can go.
I hope this would mean a price drop on the Premium box, but I'm guessing not :(
If the Elite went at a 399 price point and the Premium takes the 299 price point, it would be a glorious day :) But, it's not going to happen anytime soon. "Late-summer or fall" at best doesn't help me.
At this stage a larger HDD size would be nothing more than icing on the cake for MS. I find it hard to imagine the PS3 catching up any time soon. When numbers are neck and neck and theres pressure on 3rd party devs - then we'll see how low these big guys can go.
Gus
Sep 4, 10:29 PM
Hey man, don't knock the Pismo-it's one helluva a machine, especially now that you can upgrade it to a G4. The first TiBook was a joke if you ask me. Same video card memory as the Pismo, same speeds as the Pismo (albeit in the G4 variety), and no expandability. Let's not even talk about ruggedness. I wanted a TiBook for the longest time, but nothing has come through the pipe that I liked. The last revision was the closest to what I would have expected a year ago. Don't get me wrong, I like the Ti for it's looks and size, but at that price point, I expect something that will just blow the upgraded Pismo away.
Flame away.
Gus
Flame away.
Gus
MacRumorUser
Mar 18, 11:50 AM
Get it. I have my 360 sitting next to my PS3. I watch movies on my PS3 - I play games on the 360.
Holding out for an HD-DVD drive in the 360 is not a good idea. Even if they do get it, the fan would have to be a LOT quieter for it to be practical.
The HD-DVD player is VERY quiet. Just make sure your 360 has no disc in its normal DVD drive when using the HD-DVD player and volume wise its exactly the same as the PS3 playing BluRay player.
Holding out for an HD-DVD drive in the 360 is not a good idea. Even if they do get it, the fan would have to be a LOT quieter for it to be practical.
The HD-DVD player is VERY quiet. Just make sure your 360 has no disc in its normal DVD drive when using the HD-DVD player and volume wise its exactly the same as the PS3 playing BluRay player.
voicegy
Sep 6, 10:15 PM
I don't know if I truly "rate" for Old Skool - I'm 46 and been a member since 1/1/'02.
Maybe semi-Old Skool? :o
Maybe semi-Old Skool? :o
matticus008
Mar 20, 03:14 PM
No, this is completely wrong. Copyright is nothing more nor less than a monopoly on distribution of copies of the copyrighted work.
Anyone purchasing a copy of the copyrighted work owns that copy. They do not have a license to that copy, they own that copy. They don't need a license to do anything with that copy except for re-distributing copies of it. Because the copyright holder holds the copyright monopoly, only the copyright holder may copy the work in question and then distribute those copies. Anyone else who wants to re-distribute further copies must get a license from the copyright holder.
But no license is required to purchase a work or to use that work once it is purchased. Copyright is a restriction on what you can do with the things you have purchased and now own.
This is how the various open source licenses work, for example. They only come into play when someone tries to redistribute copies. That's the only time they *can* come into play; without any redistribution of copies, copyright law has no effect.
For example, you can, and have every right to, sell things that you have purchased. No license is required to sell your furniture, your stereo equipment, or the CDs that you have purchased or the books that you have purchased. At the turn of the century, book publishers tried to place a EULA inside their books forbidding resale. The courts--up to the Supreme Court of the United States--said that the copyright monopoly does not cover that, and thus no EULA based on the copyright monopoly can restrict it.
In the Betamax case, the Supreme Court used the same reasoning to say that time-shifting is not a copyright violation. The copyright monopoly is a restriction on what owners can do with the things that they have purchased and now own, and must be strictly interpreted for this reason.
When you buy a book, a CD, or anything else that is copyrighted, you own that copy, and may do whatever you want with that copy, with the exception that you cannot violate the copyright holder's monopoly on making copies and redistributing those copies. You can make as many copies as you want, as long as you don't distribute them; and you can distribute the original copy as long as it is the original. Neither of those acts infringes on the copyright holder's monopoly on copying and redistributing.
This is why the DMCA had to be so convoluted, making the act of circumvention illegal, rather than going to the heart of what the RIAA, etc., wanted.
No, you're not at all correct here. Digital copyrights are licenses. You do not own the copy. When you buy a CD, you own the CD and can burn it [EDIT: literally] or sell it if you want, provided you don't retain a copy. When you buy a book, you can sell the book or highlight the pages or do what you want to your copy, but you can't change three words and republish it. When you buy a music download, you have every right to use it, make short clips of it, make mix CDs from those files and give them to a few friends (as long as you are not making the CDs in bulk or charging for them). Your license does not allow you to modify the contents such that it enables you to do things not allowed by law. You can't rent a car and break all the locks so that anyone can use it without the keys. If you OWN the car, you can do that.
But you do not OWN the music you've bought, you're merely using it as provided for by the owner. Because digital files propagate from a single copy, and that original can be copied and passed along with no quality loss or actual effort to the original copier (who still retains his copy), the law supports DRM which is designed to prevent unauthorized copying. If you could put a whole retail CD and magically duplicate it exactly, including the silk-screen label, professional quality insert printing, an exact molecule-for-molecule duplicate, and if you could do this for zero cost to you and give them away to anyone over the internet, what you would be doing is against the law. Copying the digital files gives you an exact replica, at no cost, and requires no special hardware or software--which is exactly why the artists and labels feel they need DRM. They're within their rights to protect their property.
Copying for your own uses (from device to device) is prefectly within your rights, but modifying the file so it works in ways it was not originally intended IS against copyright law. It's like taking a Windows license and installing it on Mac OS. You can't do it, regardless of the fact that you own a copy of it for Windows. You bought that license for Windows and have no right to use it on a Mac (except through VPC, and only if that's the one installation you've made). Beyond the DMCA, your legally-binding Terms of Service specifically state that you are not to circumvent the protections on the files you buy and you are not to access the iTMS from anything but iTunes. Those are the terms you agreed to, and those are the terms that are enforceable in court, independent of the DMCA. If you think that the copyright owners who forced these terms to be included in Apple's software are wrong, tell them. But breaking the iTunes TOS is breaking the law. The DMCA is convoluted, I agree, and much of it can be spun to be inappropriate and restrictive. But you have to work to change it, not break the law because you don't like it. You have no right to do so, but you have the option to, and you must deal with the consequences if you choose that path. Breaking DRM is a violation of copyright law and the DMCA (or whatever similar legislation says so in your country). Steal if you want to, but know that it IS against the law and it IS stealing.
Anyone purchasing a copy of the copyrighted work owns that copy. They do not have a license to that copy, they own that copy. They don't need a license to do anything with that copy except for re-distributing copies of it. Because the copyright holder holds the copyright monopoly, only the copyright holder may copy the work in question and then distribute those copies. Anyone else who wants to re-distribute further copies must get a license from the copyright holder.
But no license is required to purchase a work or to use that work once it is purchased. Copyright is a restriction on what you can do with the things you have purchased and now own.
This is how the various open source licenses work, for example. They only come into play when someone tries to redistribute copies. That's the only time they *can* come into play; without any redistribution of copies, copyright law has no effect.
For example, you can, and have every right to, sell things that you have purchased. No license is required to sell your furniture, your stereo equipment, or the CDs that you have purchased or the books that you have purchased. At the turn of the century, book publishers tried to place a EULA inside their books forbidding resale. The courts--up to the Supreme Court of the United States--said that the copyright monopoly does not cover that, and thus no EULA based on the copyright monopoly can restrict it.
In the Betamax case, the Supreme Court used the same reasoning to say that time-shifting is not a copyright violation. The copyright monopoly is a restriction on what owners can do with the things that they have purchased and now own, and must be strictly interpreted for this reason.
When you buy a book, a CD, or anything else that is copyrighted, you own that copy, and may do whatever you want with that copy, with the exception that you cannot violate the copyright holder's monopoly on making copies and redistributing those copies. You can make as many copies as you want, as long as you don't distribute them; and you can distribute the original copy as long as it is the original. Neither of those acts infringes on the copyright holder's monopoly on copying and redistributing.
This is why the DMCA had to be so convoluted, making the act of circumvention illegal, rather than going to the heart of what the RIAA, etc., wanted.
No, you're not at all correct here. Digital copyrights are licenses. You do not own the copy. When you buy a CD, you own the CD and can burn it [EDIT: literally] or sell it if you want, provided you don't retain a copy. When you buy a book, you can sell the book or highlight the pages or do what you want to your copy, but you can't change three words and republish it. When you buy a music download, you have every right to use it, make short clips of it, make mix CDs from those files and give them to a few friends (as long as you are not making the CDs in bulk or charging for them). Your license does not allow you to modify the contents such that it enables you to do things not allowed by law. You can't rent a car and break all the locks so that anyone can use it without the keys. If you OWN the car, you can do that.
But you do not OWN the music you've bought, you're merely using it as provided for by the owner. Because digital files propagate from a single copy, and that original can be copied and passed along with no quality loss or actual effort to the original copier (who still retains his copy), the law supports DRM which is designed to prevent unauthorized copying. If you could put a whole retail CD and magically duplicate it exactly, including the silk-screen label, professional quality insert printing, an exact molecule-for-molecule duplicate, and if you could do this for zero cost to you and give them away to anyone over the internet, what you would be doing is against the law. Copying the digital files gives you an exact replica, at no cost, and requires no special hardware or software--which is exactly why the artists and labels feel they need DRM. They're within their rights to protect their property.
Copying for your own uses (from device to device) is prefectly within your rights, but modifying the file so it works in ways it was not originally intended IS against copyright law. It's like taking a Windows license and installing it on Mac OS. You can't do it, regardless of the fact that you own a copy of it for Windows. You bought that license for Windows and have no right to use it on a Mac (except through VPC, and only if that's the one installation you've made). Beyond the DMCA, your legally-binding Terms of Service specifically state that you are not to circumvent the protections on the files you buy and you are not to access the iTMS from anything but iTunes. Those are the terms you agreed to, and those are the terms that are enforceable in court, independent of the DMCA. If you think that the copyright owners who forced these terms to be included in Apple's software are wrong, tell them. But breaking the iTunes TOS is breaking the law. The DMCA is convoluted, I agree, and much of it can be spun to be inappropriate and restrictive. But you have to work to change it, not break the law because you don't like it. You have no right to do so, but you have the option to, and you must deal with the consequences if you choose that path. Breaking DRM is a violation of copyright law and the DMCA (or whatever similar legislation says so in your country). Steal if you want to, but know that it IS against the law and it IS stealing.
Applespider
May 15, 05:28 PM
As dynamicv says, the answer is no. With Bulldog you swap both over - line rental for the phone and your broadband.
There are some LLU operators who allow you to stay with BT and just switch your broadband. I'm with Be* who work that way - and very good they are too
There are some LLU operators who allow you to stay with BT and just switch your broadband. I'm with Be* who work that way - and very good they are too
idkfa
Mar 30, 04:16 PM
Wow. My first post... :D
Anyways, in response to speculation about the hidden meaning behind the Apple Logo, Wikipedia says otherwise.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Computer
Apparently the Apple Logo was designed 2 years prior to the Gay-Pride flag and does not follow the same color scheme.
Take it for what it is worth, it is the Internet after all...
Cheers.
Anyways, in response to speculation about the hidden meaning behind the Apple Logo, Wikipedia says otherwise.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Computer
Apparently the Apple Logo was designed 2 years prior to the Gay-Pride flag and does not follow the same color scheme.
Take it for what it is worth, it is the Internet after all...
Cheers.
Phat_Pat
Mar 13, 10:56 PM
I Put this in my Profile ;)
Cappy
Sep 4, 07:22 PM
It could be true just for the fact that the TiBook has been around now for a few years. Something new is likely due to replace it. I would look at it more as a positive than a negative.
zelmo
Jun 10, 09:51 AM
For the past month or so, my Folding Garden (not big enough to be a patch, much less a farm:p ) consists of:
iMac G4 800
PowerBook G4 1.33
iMac G4 700
3.6GHz Xeon
Dual 2.4GHz Xeon (only using one processor, though)
3.2GHz P4
When we add the hardware for our digital printing department, I may have the opportunity to add Folding into several more boxes.;)
iMac G4 800
PowerBook G4 1.33
iMac G4 700
3.6GHz Xeon
Dual 2.4GHz Xeon (only using one processor, though)
3.2GHz P4
When we add the hardware for our digital printing department, I may have the opportunity to add Folding into several more boxes.;)
SpankyPenzaanz
Mar 21, 11:05 AM
XBLArcade: TMNT
Thinking about CastlevaniaSOTN - just played the demo and it is only $10
Thinking about CastlevaniaSOTN - just played the demo and it is only $10
